Skip to main content

How in-between communication channels adulterating the essence of creative advertising?



The brief that we have received is not definite: Creative team
The inputs we have shared are all what we were given: Ad Sales Team
This is what the client gave and at present, they are unavailable for talk: Media Agency
It (the output) is exactly the opposite of what we are looking for: Client.

If not so often, most of the times we get to hear some of the above conversations go on between respective teams in advertising / media agencies. What could be the probable consequences: creative agencies juggling between multiple retakes; the perplexed creative team with loads of pressure and unclear communication as with what to be conveyed and at the tail end a vexed up account/client unsatisfied with output. In the entire process, the essence of advertising – the creativity would be at the risk of being adulterated.

For all this mess or confusion as we put it, the reason could be unreasonable increasing of communication channels or layered communication. 

For a single homepage takeover banner, in digital advertising platform, now the client has to go through multiple channels to reach out to creative team. And there comes many filters in between - media agencies, ad sales/account guys - through which the actual message has to pass on. As with every person has their own opinion on particular product, every team in this process has their own ideation, preposition, and thence their own version of briefing the team down the line. Although we could believe that even a peon can take part in the ideation process, how would it be to see the creative developed without creative team’s involvement?

Layered Communication Channels adulterating the essence of Advertising
Moreover, with growing ‘push it for more’ attitude, the actual requirement is being shown with added complexities making it difficult for the creative brains to crack a simple idea. To keep how the process is going at present, in simple terms:

  • -       Client (let’s number him 1) conveys he is looking for X, to Media agency (2),
  • -       The message reaching to the creative team (4) is that (1) is looking for XYZ+
  • -       In between the media agency (2) and Ad Sales Team (3) stuff up the message with complexities

In anticipation to give an outstanding output, everyone in the process try to walk that extra mile putting up the pressure on the tail end, making it difficult to cum up with a creative campaign.That said, we could realize how the essence of advertising is being shadowed by the curse of layered communication.It shows the more the advertising industry is being sectioned, the more the communication is being adulterated. 

Now, having that depicted, it is clear with the growing communication channels or layered communication, the essence of advertising is being adulterated.

Many creative agencies, even now,wish to keep the client at a direct contact, but only if they had hit the right chord in their previous endeavours. Even the clients would want to work with creative team directly thus to minimalize the gap to save time and to convey clear communication. That is how we guess the idea of in-house branding and advertising had come up with which client himself could play a dual role and he holds the total responsibility of pushing the campaign into the market that too in given time communicating exactly what he wished to.

Creative communication, being an essence of advertising, undoubtedly needs its own pace and space apart from valid inputs. To safeguard it, it is better clients or agencies overlook the layered communication and they must see channels reduced to a few. Or else they should at least do clear job marking, thus each team could work as suggested and the brief could reach creative team without adulteration.

Our opinion on how the essence of advertising is being adulterated by layered communication might differ with you. If it is, kindly share your idea with us.

Popular posts from this blog

Dear ECI, sorry I could not cast my vote, but wish for brighter India

Dear Election Commission of India (ECI) first let me apologise that I could not utilize my vote, my only right to define the future of the largest democracy on the earth, in 2014 Indian elections. I am sorry all the Telugu people for not being part of a mission called divisive forces’ eradication. I am sorry all Indians that I could not walk along with you to oust the ancestry politicians. I feel ashamed that I did not vote against a scamster worth of more than Rs. 5,000 crores. I curse myself for not helping a good administrator, who raised the bar of Andhra Pradesh in international circles, to come over the odds. I am crying deeply for not showing the Italian woman, who screwed up my state, her original ground, my foot. In addition, I stand helpless to extend my hand for development spearheaded Modi government.  Why couldn’t I cast my vote? Enough with apologies. Dear ECI, I would also like you to know the reason behind my failure in defining my future. Though it so...

Planning for a career change? Here is a constructive approach or career change advice.

An article published on  www.huffingtonpost.com  on Jul 1, 2013, based on a survey, stated that almost 80 percent of employees in their 20s want to change their careers, and the percentage is less than that of workers in their 30s and 40s. That read it could be guessed that a very small percentage of the younger lot were firm in their career plans while others were not aware of what they wanted to be and thus ended up changing their careers. Shoot up to the present , the situation is not so different . With day-to-day technology up-gradation and the increase in required skills to cope with industry downturn , employees feel the same insecurity to continue with their current career . Without focusing much on their freedom to think so, what we advise them to follow is a constructive approach while planning for a career change to avoid future job inconsistencies. Our career change advice: Assess The reasons could be many while opting for a career change. Neverthele...

MRF - The first Indian tyre manufacturer to corss Rs. 10,000 Crore turnover

MRF sculpted logo MRF (formerly Madras Rubber Factory, at present Manorama Rubber Factory), has crossed Rs. 10, 000 Crore turnover becoming the first Indian Tyre manufacturer to achieve the well deserved milepost. The growth in the revenues are evidenced through the recent press release by the biggest vehicle Tyre manufacturer from India. Addressing to the press conference on Monday in Chennai, the Chairman and Managing Director of MRF, K.M Mammen has announced the company has crossed Rs. 10,000 Crore turnover comfortably yet facing the challenging 2010. According to the press release, MRF has seen 30% more compared to the last year's. In 2010, MRF has registered it's net worth as Rs. 8,080 Crores which now has been increased to Rs. 10,000 Crore for 2011. Exulting over the achievement, the MRF Chairperson, Mr. Mammen has said the revenue is a good mix from original equipment manufacturers who have given 20 percent along with exports of 10 percent and 70 percent from ...